Earlier this month, Katie Miller introduced her latest podcast with a distinct origin story. The former Trump administration aide and spouse of Stephen Miller asserted that her lifestyle-focused show for right-leaning women addresses a gap she perceives in media offerings.
“For years, I’ve noticed the absence of digital spaces where conservative women can connect,” Miller stated in a social media video. Her post emphasized, “As a mother of three, someone who maintains a healthy diet, exercises regularly, and manages a full-time career, I recognize the lack of programming catering to women like me.”
This assertion contradicts reality. Right-wing women currently enjoy unprecedented access to online communities discussing lifestyle topics—particularly parenting and wellness. Recently termed the “womanosphere,” this digital landscape continues to thrive.
Vox Culture
Culture mirrors society. Explore our insights on finance, entertainment, and trending online conversations.
Email (required)Sign UpBy submitting your email, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Notice. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Conservative audiences frequent platforms like Evie—a right-leaning counterpart to Cosmopolitan attracting significant mainstream media coverage. They access celebrity gossip infused with reactionary theories from commentators like Candace Owens, traditionalist cultural critiques from YouTubers such as Brett Cooper, and alternative health perspectives from Alex Clark’s Culture Apothecary. Sports commentary opposing transgender inclusion features on Riley Gaines’s Gaines for Girls, while tradwife aesthetics flourish through influencers like Ballerina Farm’s Hannah Neeleman. Christian content creator Allie Beth Stuckey’s Relatable exemplifies conservative women’s lifestyle podcasts, with many hosts balancing content creation and motherhood.
Related
- The rising trend of influencers with large families
Miller’s defensive tone permeates The Katie Miller Podcast, suggesting exclusion from mainstream feminine discourse. During an episode with conservative commentator Sage Steele, Miller emphasized, “We’re creating content for our audience” before transitioning to beauty tips. “Right-leaning women rarely receive these inquiries,” she claimed, despite counterexamples like Ivanka Trump’s public persona. This perceived marginalization appears fundamental to Miller’s programming philosophy.
Within the womanosphere, victories manifest differently—celebrating niche triumphs like sharing skincare routines featuring unconventional ingredients.
This rebellious stance typifies womanosphere content, framing creators as truth-tellers challenging cultural gatekeepers. While conservative media broadly employs similar narratives, these platforms emphasize traditionally feminine subjects—from beauty regimens to household management.
The womanosphere’s expansion reveals contradictions within conservative gender politics. Republicans position themselves as defenders against progressive prudishness while simultaneously alleging exclusion from frivolous femininity. Miller’s show proves less notable for its content than its exposure of these ideological tensions.
Conservatives and the grievance industry
Traditional women’s media has historically leaned conservative, focusing on domesticity and self-presentation. However, post-2010 feminist platforms like The Cut and Teen Vogue shifted toward progressive activism. Mainstream publications like Vogue have notably excluded Trump-era first ladies from coverage.
The womanosphere emerged primarily through independent digital channels—podcasts, YouTube, and influencer accounts—where earnings potential outweighs traditional media opportunities. Miller’s venture fits seamlessly into this model.
This ecosystem thrives on denying its own existence, framing content creation as resistance against imaginary suppression.
This persecution narrative extends beyond gender-focused media. February 2025 saw blogger Scarlet coin “soy right” to describe conservatives fixated on perceived slights: “They’re aggrieved by subway anxieties, progressive language norms, and reduced video game sexualization. Despite political wins, they crave mainstream approval.”
Related
- Conservative grievance politics dominate current discourse
These resentments fuel womanosphere content, enabling creators to position themselves as overlooked authorities on attractiveness and parenting. By alleging marketplace voids, influencers elevate their platforms’ significance—implying overdue recognition in a fairer media landscape.
The womanosphere vs. the manosphere
Recent conservative claims co-opt cultural moments involving attractive women as ideological victories, asserting progressive discomfort with conventional beauty standards. This contrasts with manosphere content’s hypersexualized “raunch culture,” while womanosphere media often promotes Christian purity ideals.
Related
- The GOP’s embrace of explicit content
Womanosphere figures like Allie Beth Stuckey emphasize biblical marriage over “sinful” media portrayals. Evie’s founder cites opposition to casual sex advocacy in legacy magazines. Though purity and raunch cultures seem opposed, both reduce female sexuality to male service—a double bind where women face condemnation as either promiscuous or prudish.
The womanosphere’s driving force—unfulfilled expectations of recognition—positions Miller’s podcast as corrective action. In reality, it merely expands an established conservative media sphere, perpetuating familiar narratives of victimhood.
Source: vox.com
