The volume and saturation of sports wagering in the United States has grown to the point where it is easy to forget that at the beginning of 2018, it was authorized in only a quartet of states, and Nevada was the sole state where placing wagers on individual contests was permitted.
Everything shifted in May of that year, when the Supreme Court overturned the statute that prohibited most kinds of sports gambling. Ever since, the legitimate sports wagering sector has extended to 38 states along with Washington, DC, generating nearly $14 billion in revenue in 2024, primarily from rapidly expanding and extremely addictive mobile platforms like DraftKings and FanDuel.
Future Perfect
Examine the significant, complex challenges the world confronts and the most impactful strategies for resolving them. Delivered twice weekly.
Email (required)Sign UpBy submitting your email, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Notice. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
The reason sports betting was restricted for such a long period was due to fears that the immense financial stakes could create occurrences that would cast doubt on the reliability of athletic competitions.
And guess what? On Thursday, in connection with a combined federal, state, and municipal investigation, the FBI revealed at a Brooklyn news conference accusations against three current and past NBA athletes — including one famous coach enshrined in the Hall of Fame — for their supposed participation in evident Mafia-related schemes of deceit, fraud, and theft, encompassing precise wagers predicated on classified details…that compromises the reliability of NBA matchups. And arriving right as the NBA season commences this week.
Place your bets
These indictments represent only the newest gambling controversy affecting professional sports, but it is developing into the most substantial by far, and might potentially implicate additional players. Yet, the truly astounding aspect is that it required so much time following the legalization of sports wagering for a scandal of this magnitude to ultimately surface. And that expectation is equally related to the present operation of sports gambling as it is to the significant funds involved.
Should you not be among the roughly 20% of US grown-ups who made a sports wager during the prior year or possessed a digital betting profile, you might be unaware of the magnitude of change that legalization and digitization have brought to gambling. Gamblers are not only able to easily put down a bet using applications, but they can also engage in prop or micro bets that could see thousands of dollars hinging on such minor events as predicting which NBA player will score the next basket.
Micro bets amplify impulsiveness and elevate the possibility of compulsive betting, plus they can create opportunities for jeopardizing the integrity of the games themselves. While it’s hard to conceive of any professional athlete deliberately cooperating with criminals to sway the result of a contest, in a manner reminiscent of the 1919 Chicago Black Sox, removing oneself from a game prematurely by pretending to be hurt or simply missing an easy shot is not excessively difficult. Included within this week’s charges was the claim that Miami Heat guard Terry Rozier notified gamblers beforehand that he planned to exit a game early, thereby enabling them to earn hundreds of thousands of dollars through illicit prop bets.
An absence of integrity
Dishonest sports wagers don’t need to be commonplace for spectators to commence questioning the reliability of games across the board. This is precisely why professional sports leagues were previously firmly set against authorized sports wagering, to such an extent that the four dominant leagues and the NCAA together took legal action against New Jersey in 2012 to halt the state’s drive to sanction sports betting, which then eventually resulted in the Supreme Court ruling that granted individual states the prerogative to determine legalization on their own.
However, once the Supreme Court issued its verdict, the prospect of accumulating billions from authorized wagering demonstrated more than adequate to persuade professional sports leagues to not only revoke their opposition, but to begin embracing the betting sector wholeheartedly. Every major sports organization maintains a sanctioned wagering affiliate; individual squads possess their own agreements, with some even introducing betting venues inside their arenas. Betting odds now form a significant portion of sports programming, which might not even subsist without the extensively pervasive gambling promotional materials that are featured throughout every telecast.
Legalized sports gambling has brought about other downsides, notably the increasing societal and monetary toll of compulsive wagering — one academic paper suggested a correlation between legalized betting and diminished household savings and impaired credit scores, whereas reports to problem gambling assistance services have escalated sharply.
The Supreme Court delivered its judgment in 2018 based on unemotional, technical justifications — concerning how it was illegitimate for national legislation to dictate to state assemblies what they were permitted to approve or disallow. But regardless of whether one is a sports gambler or simply a sports enthusiast, that ruling — coupled with the concurrent development of mobile applications that eliminate all barriers to gambling — has profoundly reshaped American culture. And the accusations made on Thursday imply that we are just beginning to observe the ramifications.
A derivation of this piece originally appeared in the Future Perfect bulletin. Sign up here!
Source: vox.com
