Peter Ward, a geologist and evolutionary biologist, said it is very unlikely that any planet will be able to hold life apart from ours because of the number of geological and biological complexities.
Ward, who is the author of the book called “Rare Earth: Why Complex Life Is Uncommon in the Universe” and one of the founders of the Rare Earth Hypothesis, told the Daily Star that most of the discovered exoplanets are unable to host life, as most of them are “tidally locked” to their stars – meaning that they have only one side permanently facing their “sun”.
He added that most of the 6,000 planets that scientists have currently designated as possible candidates for holding life have their orbits too close to their parent stars, meaning that they can become “tidally locked” to them. He also dismissed the idea of life springing up in a narrow band between the “night” and “day” sides of such a planet as “highly doubtful”.
Ward was also doubtful of the existence of continents beyond the Earth.
He also pointed out that our Solar System is a simple one-star system with a stable central star – our Sun. Many of the recently discovered exoplanets exist in more complex two-star and three-star groups. The fact that there are more planets with their own gravitational fields beyond our Earth helps to pull the comets and small asteroids out of our orbit. However, according to Ward, a more complex, multi-star system would be more likely to create hazards than absorb them.
Ward said that “the numbers are too large to ever state that we are absolutely unique”, adding that early in history our Earth wasn’t an Earth-like planet either. Yet, according to Ward, so far the evidence shows that we are completely alone in our galaxy.
Sourse: sputniknews.com
